PhD thesis, chapter 5

This is the fifth post in a series of posts about my PhD thesis.
In the fifth and final chapter of my thesis, we look at how boundary conditions can be weakly imposed on the Helmholtz equation.


As in chapter 4, we must adapt the analysis of chapter 3 to apply to Helmholtz problems. The boundary operators for the Helmholtz equation satisfy less strong conditions than the operators for Laplace's equation (for Laplace's equation, the operators satisfy a condition called coercivity; for Helmholtz, the operators satisfy a weaker condition called Gårding's inequality), making proving results about Helmholtz problem harder.
After some work, we are able to prove an a priori error bound (with \(a=\tfrac32\) for the spaces we use):
$$\left\|u-u_h\right\|\leqslant ch^{a}\left\|u\right\|$$

Numerical results

As in the previous chapters, we use Bempp to show that computations with this method match the theory.
The error of our approximate solutions of a Dirichlet (left) and mixed Dirichlet–Neumann problems in the exterior of a sphere with meshes with different values of \(h\). The dashed lines show order \(\tfrac32\) convergence.

Wave scattering

Boundary element methods are often used to solve Helmholtz wave scattering problems. These are problems in which a sound wave is travelling though a medium (eg the air), then hits an object: you want to know what the sound wave that scatters off the object looks like.
If there are multiple objects that the wave is scattering off, the boundary element method formulation can get quite complicated. When using weak imposition, the formulation is simpler: this one advantage of this method.
The following diagram shows a sound wave scattering off a mixure of sound-hard and sound-soft spheres. Sound-hard objects reflect sound well, while sound-soft objects absorb it well.
A sound wave scattering off a mixture of sound-hard (white) and sound-soft (black) spheres.
If you are trying to design something with particular properties—for example, a barrier that absorbs sound—you may want to solve lots of wave scattering problems on an object on some objects with various values taken for their reflective properties. This type of problem is often called an inverse problem.
For this type of problem, weakly imposing boundary conditions has advantages: the discretisation of the Calderón projector can be reused for each problem, and only the terms due to the weakly imposed boundary conditions need to be recalculated. This is an advantages as the boundary condition terms are much less expensive (ie they use much less time and memory) to calculate than the Calderón term that is reused.

This concludes chapter 5, the final chapter of my thesis. Why not celebrate reaching the end by cracking open the following figure before reading the concluding blog post.
An acoustic wave scattering off a sound-hard champagne bottle and a sound-soft cork.
Previous post in series
PhD thesis, chapter 4
This is the fifth post in a series of posts about my PhD thesis.
Next post in series
PhD thesis, chapter ∞

Similar posts

PhD thesis, chapter 4
PhD thesis, chapter 3
PhD thesis, chapter ∞
PhD thesis, chapter 2


Comments in green were written by me. Comments in blue were not written by me.
 Add a Comment 

I will only use your email address to reply to your comment (if a reply is needed).

Allowed HTML tags: <br> <a> <small> <b> <i> <s> <sup> <sub> <u> <spoiler> <ul> <ol> <li>
To prove you are not a spam bot, please type "quotient" in the box below (case sensitive):


Show me a random blog post

May 2021

Close encounters of the second kind

Jan 2021

Christmas (2020) is over
▼ show ▼
▼ show ▼
▼ show ▼
▼ show ▼
▼ show ▼
▼ show ▼
▼ show ▼
▼ show ▼
▼ show ▼


talking maths in public news golden spiral london underground national lottery wave scattering php computational complexity probability simultaneous equations polynomials rugby radio 4 stickers folding tube maps rhombicuboctahedron data electromagnetic field platonic solids light plastic ratio error bars world cup signorini conditions countdown christmas card javascript gaussian elimination football approximation big internet math-off pythagoras machine learning pizza cutting folding paper asteroids realhats palindromes tennis the aperiodical sport books stirling numbers matrix of minors pi approximation day curvature mathsteroids sound matrix multiplication craft exponential growth manchester science festival pac-man dates game of life logic latex final fantasy games programming guest posts draughts matt parker cross stitch geogebra binary weather station hannah fry flexagons sobolev spaces pi gerry anderson advent calendar chess mathslogicbot tmip matrices noughts and crosses puzzles people maths bubble bobble frobel dragon curves boundary element methods graphs numerical analysis determinants quadrilaterals convergence matrix of cofactors squares reuleaux polygons sorting chalkdust magazine data visualisation ternary hats christmas geometry trigonometry coins ucl menace oeis golden ratio cambridge estimation bempp dataset numbers captain scarlet misleading statistics london video games wool go a gamut of games preconditioning chebyshev graph theory finite element method raspberry pi interpolation speed arithmetic braiding inline code bodmas phd map projections royal institution harriss spiral royal baby pascal's triangle hexapawn manchester python twitter recursion game show probability fractals reddit european cup propositional calculus nine men's morris martin gardner weak imposition triangles mathsjam inverse matrices accuracy logs statistics


Show me a random blog post
▼ show ▼
© Matthew Scroggs 2012–2021