mscroggs.co.uk
mscroggs.co.uk

subscribe

Blog

 2020-02-16 
This is the fifth post in a series of posts about my PhD thesis.
In the fifth and final chapter of my thesis, we look at how boundary conditions can be weakly imposed on the Helmholtz equation.

Analysis

As in chapter 4, we must adapt the analysis of chapter 3 to apply to Helmholtz problems. The boundary operators for the Helmholtz equation satisfy less strong conditions than the operators for Laplace's equation (for Laplace's equation, the operators satisfy a condition called coercivity; for Helmholtz, the operators satisfy a weaker condition called Gårding's inequality), making proving results about Helmholtz problem harder.
After some work, we are able to prove an a priori error bound (with \(a=\tfrac32\) for the spaces we use):
$$\left\|u-u_h\right\|\leqslant ch^{a}\left\|u\right\|$$

Numerical results

As in the previous chapters, we use Bempp to show that computations with this method match the theory.
The error of our approximate solutions of a Dirichlet (left) and mixed Dirichlet–Neumann problems in the exterior of a sphere with meshes with different values of \(h\). The dashed lines show order \(\tfrac32\) convergence.

Wave scattering

Boundary element methods are often used to solve Helmholtz wave scattering problems. These are problems in which a sound wave is travelling though a medium (eg the air), then hits an object: you want to know what the sound wave that scatters off the object looks like.
If there are multiple objects that the wave is scattering off, the boundary element method formulation can get quite complicated. When using weak imposition, the formulation is simpler: this one advantage of this method.
The following diagram shows a sound wave scattering off a mixure of sound-hard and sound-soft spheres. Sound-hard objects reflect sound well, while sound-soft objects absorb it well.
A sound wave scattering off a mixture of sound-hard (white) and sound-soft (black) spheres.
If you are trying to design something with particular properties—for example, a barrier that absorbs sound—you may want to solve lots of wave scattering problems on an object on some objects with various values taken for their reflective properties. This type of problem is often called an inverse problem.
For this type of problem, weakly imposing boundary conditions has advantages: the discretisation of the Calderón projector can be reused for each problem, and only the terms due to the weakly imposed boundary conditions need to be recalculated. This is an advantages as the boundary condition terms are much less expensive (ie they use much less time and memory) to calculate than the Calderón term that is reused.

This concludes chapter 5, the final chapter of my thesis. Why not celebrate reaching the end by cracking open the following figure before reading the concluding blog post.
An acoustic wave scattering off a sound-hard champagne bottle and a sound-soft cork.
Previous post in series
PhD thesis, chapter 4
This is the fifth post in a series of posts about my PhD thesis.
Next post in series
PhD thesis, chapter ∞

Similar posts

PhD thesis, chapter 4
PhD thesis, chapter 3
PhD thesis, chapter ∞
PhD thesis, chapter 2

Comments

Comments in green were written by me. Comments in blue were not written by me.
 Add a Comment 


I will only use your email address to reply to your comment (if a reply is needed).

Allowed HTML tags: <br> <a> <small> <b> <i> <s> <sup> <sub> <u> <spoiler> <ul> <ol> <li>
To prove you are not a spam bot, please type "cosine" in the box below (case sensitive):

Archive

Show me a random blog post
 2020 

Jul 2020

Happy √3-ϕ+3 Approximation Day!

May 2020

A surprising fact about quadrilaterals
Interesting tautologies

Mar 2020

Log-scaled axes

Feb 2020

PhD thesis, chapter ∞
PhD thesis, chapter 5
PhD thesis, chapter 4
PhD thesis, chapter 3
Inverting a matrix
PhD thesis, chapter 2

Jan 2020

PhD thesis, chapter 1
Gaussian elimination
Matrix multiplication
Christmas (2019) is over
 2019 
▼ show ▼
 2018 
▼ show ▼
 2017 
▼ show ▼
 2016 
▼ show ▼
 2015 
▼ show ▼
 2014 
▼ show ▼
 2013 
▼ show ▼
 2012 
▼ show ▼

Tags

talking maths in public interpolation reuleaux polygons folding paper phd golden spiral video games countdown radio 4 programming final fantasy tmip wave scattering hannah fry graph theory martin gardner logs rhombicuboctahedron matrix of minors dataset hexapawn world cup javascript data exponential growth geogebra statistics quadrilaterals royal baby a gamut of games approximation gerry anderson misleading statistics boundary element methods probability sorting plastic ratio stickers weak imposition oeis polynomials london accuracy sport football games the aperiodical raspberry pi data visualisation arithmetic sobolev spaces determinants chalkdust magazine noughts and crosses sound trigonometry error bars captain scarlet golden ratio twitter christmas card electromagnetic field signorini conditions weather station speed asteroids nine men's morris mathsjam reddit binary finite element method matrix multiplication machine learning european cup big internet math-off chebyshev map projections logic menace curvature dates simultaneous equations inline code coins go manchester fractals cross stitch pizza cutting matt parker books graphs numerical analysis ternary national lottery harriss spiral folding tube maps preconditioning ucl people maths dragon curves propositional calculus realhats braiding royal institution python gaussian elimination chess bodmas mathsteroids matrices geometry squares game show probability bubble bobble php news tennis cambridge inverse matrices bempp advent calendar light estimation convergence flexagons london underground draughts hats craft game of life pac-man wool latex pi approximation day mathslogicbot pythagoras computational complexity christmas pi triangles manchester science festival matrix of cofactors puzzles platonic solids rugby frobel palindromes

Archive

Show me a random blog post
▼ show ▼
© Matthew Scroggs 2012–2020